http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/?p=349
http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/wp-content/uploads/1_7.mp3
[audio: http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/wp-content/uploads/1_7.mp3]
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/?p=349
http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/wp-content/uploads/1_7.mp3
[audio: http://versebyversebibleteaching.com/wp-content/uploads/1_7.mp3]
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It comes down to it, will this world leader rule from Babylon or from Jerusalem? I don’t think this is an either/or however; if you add in the dimensionality of time.
For a time this specific Antichrist will rule from Jerusalem, but will likely have to withdraw to Iraq as there are as yet unfulfilled prophecies regarding at least a partial destruction of Jerusalem and a rebuilding as well as kicking out some kind of economic leader, a man of peace who is “building” and yet corrupting the land (in Ezekiel it describes some destruction and perversion in the worship, as well as the temple to be built, but read especially Isaiah 22:9-22 which describes the Lord of Hosts throwing a particular person out of the land and giving the station of that person to another, the names of both that person and his father are given, which the name’s meanings should make you snicker, as it’s clearly referring to a messianic prophecy–the true King)
Try taking this into your account of the progression of events that will eventually put Jerusalem on the proper way in God’s plan, by personal intervention from the Lord of Hosts.
Art created for a dictator has only one purpose: it is to present the dictator’s policies in such a way as to impress or seduce the viewer into accepting them. In a free society, art has many “purposes” (or no purpose at all), self-expression being one of the main ones. Propaganda art is often inferior in artistic values and creativity–look at some of the crap that was produced in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia. This is not always the case, as you would see in the revolutionary and Napoleonic paintings of David. But the artistry in these cases is always secondary to the propaganda. Also, you almost never get anything daring and new in propaganda art.
Christ, I thought this was an interesting video in light of what you have been teaching about. It is only around 5 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/user/JewishHistoryDotOrg#p/c/0FA8227766E8EC2E/17/RsPZGdQGE2k
Ok, I put a “t” at the end of your name because I am so used to typing Christ.
Excerpt from video clip
The Rabbis always opposed conversion for alterior motives.
This is based on the Jewish idea that one need not be Jewish in order to have an eternal soul, merit the world to come, etc. Judaism, out of all the monotheistic religions, is the only one which is not exclusive. By contrast, Catholicism inists that the only way one can be saved is through Jesus, and in Islam the only way one comes to the world to come is through belief in Mohammad. Judaism does not have this exclusivity. Therefore, while in other religions they have a drive to force conversion, as they view it as a favor, Judaism has no such compulsion.
In Judaism, the only things which are required of everybody are the 7 basic Noahide laws:
1)No Idolatry
2) No Murder
3)No Theft
4)No Sexual immorality
5) No Blasphemy
6)No Eating the limb of a live animal
7)The requirement to set up courts of Justice
However, thats it- one does not have to take on any of the ritual observances of Judaism. Therefore, conversion was always supposed to be based on the conviction of the convert, and never for alterior motives such as Marriage, money, etc. Therefore, the Jews were always very reticent to accept such converts who converted for reasons other than true desire.
I been watching your videos, they seem pretty spot on. They also make sense of all this Zionism stuff I’ve been reading about. I recently come across Rik Clay and his material about how the 2012 Olympic Logo can be repositioned to spell Zion. Although I don’t necessarily agree with all his views I found the 2012 thing to be rather interesting.